by Lisa Ruth Brunner, Bernhard Streitwieser, and Rajika Bhandari
As higher education, migration, and mobility intertwine in increasingly complex ways, we need a new way to analyze international student mobility (ISM).
Higher education institutions in Japan and South Korea have strived to attract target numbers of international students. While each country had (nearly) reached its goals, the COVID-19 pandemic affected student flows.
While the past four decades of academic personnel system reforms have changed the relationship between faculty and their institutions and boosted the competitiveness of China’s higher education in the international arena, further reforms or change will be required.
From a common Soviet governance approach four different university governance models emerged in former Soviet states after 1991. The models, while interesting in their evolution, might best be considered in light of the operating contexts.
